Home

Product Connections

 

 
Subscribe to Indoor Environment Connections
Got IAQ Questions? IAQ List Has Answers!

 

HOME
THIS MONTH
SEARCH
ABOUT US
EDITORIAL BOARD
CONVENTION CONNECTION
PRODUCT CONNECTION
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DIRECTORY
CONTENT LICENSING
ARCHIVE
DIGITAL AD REQUIREMENTS, ADVERTISING & MEDIA KIT
SAMPLE ISSUE
SUBSCRIBE

June 2007

Healthcare HVACR Designers Seek Certification

Word on the Street

AIHA Announces New Logo, Ethical Principles

Architect to Abate Asbestos Hazards below Capitol

Association Watch

Editorial -- Snake Oil or Good Science

IAQ and Schools -- Avoiding Possible IAQ Problems in the Summer

Sampling -- Benefits of Applying Moldiness Index Abound
 

Healthcare HVACR Designers Seek Certification
By Steve Sauer

More than 40 individuals experienced in designing heating, ventilation, air-conditioning and refrigeration systems in healthcare facilities have applied to take a 115-question examination this month that could make them the world’s first people certified in the field.

The Healthcare Facility Design Professional, which is to debut during a live session held June 28 in Long Beach, Calif., is the first certification program to emerge from the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.

This program’s initiation reflects a quick turnaround for ASHRAE, which announced only last July that it was exploring a system of certifications that would focus on this topic and others, like sustainability, commissioning and building operation. ASHRAE’s anticipated launch of the HFDP certification this month fulfills the original schedule laid out in that announcement nearly one year ago: that the program would be expected to launch in the summer of 2007.

A market research study ASHRAE conducted in 2005 had showed more than 80 percent of its members wanted the organization to certify people in specific areas. ASHRAE said last year that certifications it would establish would be “in response to member and market demand.”

“As you know, business these days moves fast,” ASHRAE education manager Joyce Abrams told IE Connections in May. “People have come to expect fast results. Think of high-speed internet, self-check outs in grocery stores and the Home Depot, and online banking. The market need was identified and pinpointed quickly, which meant that we needed to respond quickly.”

Abrams said over 40 people had applied to take the June HFDP exam by the original registration deadline of May 18, which was subsequently extended one week as is custom with ASHRAE events. “In the case of the HFDP exam specifically, we extended the deadline as a direct response to requests from potential candidates,” said Abrams.

The actual number of test takers on June 28 may be fewer than 40, however, as applications are subject to ASHRAE’s approval.

Eligibility requirements relate to academic and occupational experience. For instance, licensed professional engineers are eligible for the examination if they possess two years’ experience in healthcare HVAC&R design. Work experience requirements are most stringent for those with only a high school diploma or equivalent: They must have a minimum of 10 years’ experience in HVAC&R design, including at least seven specializing in HVAC&R design in healthcare facilities. Experience levels also vary for different types of higher education.

The certification is open to all qualified individuals regardless of their membership status in ASHRAE. Certificants are to comply with the organization’s code of ethics.

The timed HFDP exam is to be offered over two hours on the day after ASHRAE concludes its four-day meeting in Long Beach.

As part of the technical program of ASHRAE’s annual meeting, a two-part seminar on June 25 explores natural ventilation, including its role in preventing the spread of infectious disease in two Chinese hospitals. A technical forum on June 26 addresses the emerging use of lower dewpoint levels in hospital operating rooms, and other settings, to temper relative humidity levels.

“Of course, not everyone who intends to earn the certification is planning to attend the Annual Meeting in Long Beach,” said Abrams. Beginning this fall, future offerings of the exam are to take place at more than 150 testing locations of the Kansas-based corporation Applied Measurement Professionals Inc.

“Because the exam soon will be available in a computer-based format in testing centers across the United States and Canada and slightly later in other countries around the world, many people have indicated that they are waiting to take the test closer to home,” said Abrams. Collaborating on the technical content for the certification exams is the American Hospital Association, a division of the American Society for Healthcare Engineering, which cosponsored a 2004 IAQ symposium in Tampa with ASHRAE.

Dale Woodin, executive director for ASHE, described how ASHRAE’s new certification for healthcare facility designers complements ASHE’s four existing healthcare facility-related certifications. Those are geared toward facility managers, risk managers, environmental services professionals, and the managers of healthcare materials and resources.

Woodin, who is a certified healthcare facility manager, said each certification covers a parallel area. ASHRAE’s HFDP program fits in with the model, he said, adding that people who are certified tend to employ the services others bearing similar credentials.

ASHRAE’s Web site comments on the value of its certification to society, saying, “More knowledgeable engineers can design better HVAC&R systems for the betterment of society as a whole, for current generations and for generations to come. Earning an ASHRAE certification indicates mastery of a given body of knowledge, as determined by subject matter experts in that field.”

While the certification does not bear any third-party accreditation, Abrams said it was developed to be largely compliant with rules for accreditation from the American National Standards Institute and the National Commission for Certifying Agencies.

“As the staff liaison to ASHRAE’s Certification Committee and someone who has been involved in credentialing programs for many years, I have kept both the ANSI ... rules and the NCCA standards in mind throughout the process of developing our certification programs,” said Abrams. “The Committee has seen both sets of guidelines and agrees that we have stayed on-target, with a few exceptions that can be addressed later.”

“I am told that although ASHRAE has not applied for third party accreditation for the [HFDP] program at this time, we have developed the program so that it would meet accreditation requirements,” said Jodi Dunlop, ASHRAE public relations manager. “Whether to apply for accreditation, and, if so, with whom, has not been decided. However, ASHRAE recognizes the benefits of third party accreditation, as exemplified by our obtaining ANSI accreditation of our standards.”

“Hypothetically speaking,” said Abrams, “even if the programs are never submitted for third party accreditation, the ANSI rules and NCCA standards are pedagogically sound, so designing a program that could meet these requirements helps to ensure high quality. We can meet or exceed ‘industry standard’ without actually getting the accreditation.”

Asked why ASHRAE has not submitted the program for third-party accreditation prior to its debut, Abrams replied, “Several of the reasons that we have not yet submitted our first program for accreditation are related to the fact that the accreditation process requires a significant commitment of resources.

“The documentation required by ANSI, for example, can be voluminous, and the direct costs for submission are in the thousands of dollars,” Abrams continued. “We want to launch the first program very quickly, without losing any quality. So, as we balance our resources – especially people and time – we are focusing on the substance of the program, particularly the examination.”

The HFDP examination fee is $275 for ASHRAE members and $395 for nonmembers. The certification itself is good for three years before it must be renewed.

For comparison purposes, the American Indoor Air Quality Council currently offers eight third-party-accredited certifications, with higher fees of $300 for members of the Indoor Air Quality Association and $400 for nonmembers. IAQ Council certifications are valid for one less year before recertification applies.

“From a philosophical perspective, if accreditation does not add enough to the marketability and credibility of the program, then the cost of accreditation may outweigh the potential benefits,” said Abrams. “Of course, the benefits may very well outweigh the costs – but that cost-benefit analysis has not yet been completed.”


 

Return to Top

Word on the Street

CHALK UP ANOTHER VICTORY FOR THE HYGIENE HYPOTHESIS
Those extolling the virtues of early exposure to allergens will take refuge in a new study presented at an international conference last month. The higher the amount of endotoxin in homes, the less likely children under 3 were to develop either wheezing or eczema, say researchers from the Arizona Respiratory Center in Tucson, Ariz. Carpeting, a musty indoor smell, and interior wall leaks are among household factors that suggest endotoxin exposure, said researcher Melissa P. Celaya, who presented the study during a May 20 poster session at the American Thoracic Society’s conference in San Francisco. Such environmental factors – which also include substandard home conditions and having homes that are more than 30 years old – influence the incidence of wheeze and eczema in children. The study followed children through age 5 and focused on correlating environmental and immunological factors. Celaya said the researchers intend to study the possible role of genetic predisposition in a child’s responses to environmental triggers.

THE UNINTENDED EFFECT OF INDOOR SMOKING BANS
At some places where indoor smoking bans have taken effect, the air inside is noticeably cleaner. Still, the air outside building entrances can suffer when the smoking ban does not extend to immediately adjacent areas. In a separate session held during the American Thoracic Society’s international conference, Dr. Luke Naeher of the University of Georgia addressed the clustering of smokers in that college town. “You can have 40 to 50 smokers in a small area, which translates to fairly aggressive exposures to secondhand smoke, even if it’s outside,” said Naeher. “We want to know what those exposures are, and if it’s unhealthy, we want to tell policy makers who are making decisions about these regulations.” Some lawmakers have passed smoking restrictions not just indoors but also within a certain distance of no-smoking establishments. MOLD INSPECTION TO BE DESCRIBED ON TV
The moisture and mold management inspection services offered by Environmental Service Professionals are to be described in a media campaign, according to a company press release issued May 14. ESP, which purchased the Allstate Home Inspections franchise in January, is to be the subject of a media campaign beginning this month by Clearvision Productions, a Hollywood company that makes and distributes video news releases intended for inclusion in television newscasts. As described by David Alvarado of Clearvision, the plan is to target various media outlets – TV, radio and newspapers – “to build brand awareness with the public and business community.” Environmental Service Professionals CEO Ed Torres added that the campaign would bring attention to the company’s Certified Environmental Home Inspector and Mold and Moisture Maintenance programs. A pair of Center for Media and Democracy studies released last year find that TV newscasts airing video news releases often fail to disclose that they are prepackaged material funded by the company spotlighted in them.

CHAPTERS APLENTY
Milwaukee, Wis., and Chicago, Ill., are the newest cities to be approved for the expansion of the Indoor Air Quality Association’s chapter program. Wane Baker is the chapter director in Milwaukee chapter, and David Zeidner leads the Windy City’s. These newest locations, approved at the end of April, closely followed two additions in March, when Chuck Molyneaux opened the chapter in Hampton Roads, Va., and Craig Camel started another in Philadelphia, Pa. Chapter membership is included in the cost of IAQA membership, giving all members automatic access to these local chapters. Their educational workshops, usually held two to four times a year, typically consist of half- or full-day presentations from industry leaders. Camel’s hosted its initial chapter workshop last month, with guest speaker Glenn Fellman, IAQA executive director and IE Connections publisher. Chapter workshops also provide an environment for the exchange of ideas and contacts, as well as certification renewal credits for attendees holding American IAQ Council certifications. Chapters in the United States currently exist in 41 metropolitan areas in 28 states, as well as one in Toronto, Canada, and another in Hong Kong. For more information, contact Ben Auman, IAQA chapter relations manager, by e-mail at IAQben@aol.com or by phone at (301) 231-8388 ext. 20.

COMMENTS WANTED ON EPA AUDIT POLICY
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is seeking comments on how a policy that offers reduced penalties to companies for self-disclosing environmental violations should apply to the new owners of recently acquired facilities. The audit policy offers reduced penalties to companies that self-police their programs, promptly disclose and correct any violations discovered, and take steps to prevent future violations.

“Our top priority is to protect the environment and public health. We have a variety of tools and options to do that,” said Granta Nakayama, assistant administrator of EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance. “New owners of recently acquired facilities that come forward to make a ‘clean start’ can address their environmental issues and make changes to ensure they stay in compliance and reduce pollutants going forward.”

Companies with newly acquired facilities can use the audit policy to examine their performance and work with EPA to come into compliance with environmental laws. Since 1995, more than 3,000 companies have disclosed and resolved violations at over 9,000 facilities under this policy. EPA is seeking input from the public on how best to encourage new owners to use the audit policy. EPA will accept written comments until July 13; for instructions on submitting comments, visit www.epa.gov/compliance.

In addition to encouraging new owners to participate, EPA is also considering ways to make it easier for companies to disclose violations. In the near future, the EPA will be developing a system that would allow companies to disclose certain violations through an EPA Web site.

Next Month
The newly formed Green Mechanical Council is at the forefront of a movement to engage mechanical contractors in realizing their role in climate change. Board Chairman Dan Chiles writes in the July issue about the daunting task of “retrofitting HVAC systems in our existing 130 million buildings. ... It’s not glamorous and it’s not architectural. It’s a dirty job, but if we are to meet the coming mandates for smaller carbon emissions and reduced impact on air and water quality, somebody’s gotta do it.”

Return to Top

AIHA Announces New Logo, Ethical Principles
By Steve Sauer

A document of ethical principles for members of professional industrial hygiene associations has been finalized, its implementation coinciding with one association’s debut of a new logo and public emphasis on occupational health. During a time when the American Industrial Hygiene Association rolls out a fresh marketing initiative with a sharp focus on “Protecting Worker Health,” the association also replaces a longstanding code of ethics for members with the new set of guiding ethical principles. The document, approved by ballot last month by AIHA’s board and those of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists and AIHA’s Academy of Industrial Hygiene, applies to members of those three nonprofits.

A redesigned AIHA logo and stated core focus on “Protecting Worker Health” were scheduled to make their debut during the American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Expo, held in Philadelphia during the opening days of June. The event is cosponsored annually by ACGIH.

The code of ethics that the new document replaces also previously applied to those certified by the credentialing body in the field of industrial hygiene. That code of ethics is being revised to act as an enforceable code applicable to recipients of the two American Board of Industrial Hygiene certifications, the Certified Industrial Hygienist and Certified Associate Industrial Hygienist.

The code of ethics, originally adopted in the 1980s and updated in 1995, consists of six “canons of ethical conduct.” The set of ethical principles outlines expectations the organizations have for members, offering a list that, in itself, holds no bombshells – no new restrictions on actions frowned upon by the code of ethics, and no omissions that would encourage behavior previously in violation of the code.

However, the ethical principles for members are intended only to serve as guidance and not be enforceable. “The member ethical principles document is more of an affirmation-based code of ethics than the new ABIH Code of Ethics, which is enforceable,” said AIHA Assistant Executive Director Peter O’Neil.

The organizations have been preparing the public for this distinction for months. A joint letter in December from all professional industrial hygiene organizations said ABIH said was separately developing “new, enforceable membership ethical standards and complaint procedures” – a code meant to “identify appropriate professional conduct standards” and “bind all ABIH certificants to specific, minimum rules of behavior.”

One word absent in the transition from the code of ethics to the ethical principles is “shall,” which is often used in standards and guidelines to indicate mandatory actions. In its place is the word “should,” which in the same settings implies a voluntary action. The two main sections of the ethical principles document pertain to a member’s responsibilities to the profession and its professional associations, and also to clients, employers and employees. Both sets also deal with members’ responsibilities to the public.

The responsibilities to the profession are about satisfying organizational rules. A section of four numbered items is devoted to conflicts of interest, a topic that has been getting an increased amount of attention throughout the IAQ industry throughout recent months.

Under the guidelines, “members should ... disclose to clients or employers significant circumstances that could be construed as a conflict of interest, or an appearance of impropriety”; “avoid conduct that could cause a conflict of interest with a client, employer, employee, or the public”; “assure that a conflict of interest does not compromise legitimate interests of a client, employer, employee, or the public and does not influence/interfere with professional judgments”; and “refrain from offering, or accepting inappropriate payments, gifts, or other forms of compensation or benefits in order to secure work, or that are intended to influence professional judgment.”

Another industry organization tweaking the ethical principles that apply to its members is the Indoor Air Quality Association, which governs its members through a document it calls the Code of Ethics. Attempting to deal specifically with the ethical dilemma of professional members in the mold and IAQ arenas performing both contracting and consulting on the same jobs, IAQA created a special interest committee in February to explore possible changes in code.

The committee has created three smaller groups, each responsible for one of three tasks, including creating a draft amendment to the Code of Ethics and creating “a disclosure form for people to use in case they get into a conflict of interest,” committee chair Ian Cull told IE Connections last month. He said a draft position paper, created by a third subcommittee, was circulating among advisers to the committee with a request for feedback.

In AIHA’s new marketing plan replacing the older logo and tagline of “Your Essential Connection,” the new slogan intends to communicate more clearly the essential role of industrial hygienists in protecting the health of “a growing number of external audiences including allied professions, government, media, and business leaders.”

Dr. Frank M. Renshaw, AIHA president, said in a statement on April 24 that the new brand, including the tagline of “Protecting Worker Health,” reflects a collaborative approach toward creativity drawing in the points of view of many stakeholders over a long time period.

“AIHA member opinions, attitudes, and observations drove the creative process, beginning with four focus groups conducted at the 2005 American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Exposition,” he said. “Data from those sessions was analyzed by Washington, D.C.-based marketing consultant McKinley Marketing Inc.”

The association said input also came “at several important steps” from its public relations staff and a representative group of members it called “a stakeholder sounding board.” In addition, “a messaging analysis report by communications consultancy Hill & Knowlton supported development of the logo and tagline,” AIHA said.

“Collective input” from the stakeholders was translated by the Alexandria, Va., firm PCI Communications “into this visual representation to reflect the core attributes of protection, community, knowledge, and credibility,” AIHA said.

AIHA is not the only IAQ-related organization to have pursued a modified public image of late. Most recently, the Association of Specialists in Cleaning and Restoration, or ASCR International, switched its name on Feb. 16 to become the Restoration Industry Association, or RIA. Along with the change of name and a new logo, the association will attempt to strengthen its grip on all aspects of restoration, including that of buildings, mechanical systems, rugs, carpets and textiles.

The Institute of Inspection, Cleaning and Restoration Certification has been engaged in meetings dedicated to its Long Range Plan, according to a column published in May by President Ruth Travis, who describes the IICRC’s first objective as being “the Unifying Voice for the Inspection, Cleaning, and Restoration/Remediation Industry.”

IICRC is one of a few IAQ-related organizations that has successfully achieved accreditation from the American National Standards Institute as a standards-writing body – a list that also includes the Indoor Environmental Standards Organization. IICRC has published one standard under its ANSI-accredited capacity and is currently pursuing the publication of a second. The National Air Duct Cleaners Association is currently seeking ANSI accreditation.

In December, ACGIH had released a long-range strategic plan that includes plans to begin serving as the “dominant resource for the integration and exchange of scientific and technical knowledge” for its members. Two other main goals outlined in the ACGIH plan are to become “a leading source for information and knowledge about occupational and environmental health” and “a powerful force for creating an environment to improve worker health.”

AIHA, in its press release in April, offered two rejected terms from its proposed tagline revisions, “environment” and “community.” The association said new visual identities would be phased in on all AIHA publications, including its Web site and The Synergist, throughout 2007.

SIDEBAR for page 15:
Joint Industrial Hygiene Associations Member Ethical Principles Approved May 2007

The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA), and AIHA’s Academy of Industrial Hygiene (AIH) are nonprofit voluntary professional membership associations dedicated to the advancement of the field of industrial hygiene, and the protection of health and safety. Therefore, the IH Professional Associations support quality professional standards and practices, and expect members to meet such standards. In support of these important purposes, the IH Professional Associations promote ethical professional practices and strongly encourage members to understand ethical responsibilities. As a matter of professional competence and public confidence, members are expected to conduct themselves consistent with applicable ethics standards, including those of the American Board of Industrial Hygiene (ABIH). Accordingly, the IH Professional Associations have adopted the following member ethical principles in order to guide the members, support the profession, and protect health and safety.

  • I. Responsibilities to the Professional Organizations, the Profession and the Public.
    • A. In order to satisfy organizational and legal policies and rules, members should:
      1. Comply with laws, regulations, policies, and ethical standards governing professional practice of industrial hygiene and related activities, including those of professional associations and credentialing organizations.
      2. Provide accurate and truthful information to professional associations and credentialing organizations.
      3. Cooperate with professional associations and credentialing organizations concerning ethics matters and the collection of information related to an ethics matter.
      4. Report apparent violations of applicable professional organizations’ ethical standards to appropriate organizations and agencies upon a reasonable and clear factual basis.
      5. Refrain from any public behavior that is clearly in violation of accepted professional, ethical or legal standards.
      6. Promote equal opportunity and diversity in professional activities.
      7. Support and disseminate the association’s ethics principles to other professionals.
  • II. Responsibilities to Clients, Employers, Employees and the Public.
    • A. In order to provide ethical professional services, members should:
      1. Deliver competent services in a timely manner, and with objective and independent professional judgment in decision-making.
      2. Recognize the limitations of one’s professional ability, and provide services only when qualified. The member is responsible for determining the limits of his/her own professional abilities based on education, knowledge, skills, practice experience, and other relevant considerations.
      3. Provide appropriate professional referrals when unable to provide competent professional assistance.
      4. Maintain and respect the confidentiality of sensitive information obtained in the course of professional or related activities unless: the information pertains to an illegal activity; a court or governmental agency lawfully directs the release of the information; the client/employer expressly authorizes the release of specific information; or, the failure to release such information would likely result in death or serious physical harm to employees and/or the public.
      5. Properly use professional credentials and provide truthful and accurate representations concerning education, experience, competency and the performance of services.
      6. Provide truthful and accurate representations to the public in advertising, public statements/representations, and in the preparation of estimates concerning costs, services, and expected results.
      7. Recognize and respect the intellectual property rights of others, and act in an accurate, truthful, and complete manner, including activities related to professional work and research.
      8. Affix or authorize the use of one’s seal, stamp or signature only when the document is prepared by the certificant/candidate or someone under his/her direction and control.
      9. Refrain from business activities and practices that unlawfully restrict competition.
    • B. In order to satisfy organizational policies and legal requirements concerning possible conflicts of interest and similar issues, members should:
      1. Disclose to clients or employers significant circumstances that could be construed as a conflict of interest, or an appearance of impropriety.
      2. Avoid conduct that could cause a conflict of interest with a client, employer, employee, or the public.
      3. Assure that a conflict of interest does not compromise legitimate interests of a client, employer, employee, or the public and does not influence/interfere with professional judgments.
      4. Refrain from offering, or accepting inappropriate payments, gifts, or other forms of compensation or benefits in order to secure work, or that are intended to influence professional judgment.
    • C. In order to satisfy organizational policies and legal requirements concerning public health and safety, members should:
      1. Follow appropriate health and safety procedures in the course of performing professional work to protect clients, employers, employees, and the public from conditions where injury and damage are reasonably foreseeable.
      2. Inform appropriate management representatives and/or governmental bodies of violations of legal and regulatory requirements when obligated or otherwise clearly appropriate.
      3. Make reasonable efforts to ensure that the results of industrial hygiene assessments are communicated to exposed populations.
      4. Source: American Industrial Hygiene Association

Return to Top

Architect to Abate Asbestos Hazards below Capitol
By Steve Sauer


Asbestos in utility tunnels underneath the U.S. Capitol building is to be removed under a joint agreement last month between the Architect of the Capitol and the federal Office of Compliance. The agreement, which is subject to judicial review, is intended to satisfy the concerns of those working in a power plant’s utility tunnels below the Capitol in Washington, D.C.

John Thayer, a 43-year-old crew supervisor and 22-year employee of the Architect of the Capitol, has made himself a vocal advocate for the safety of his 10-man crew working in the asbestos-laden tunnels. Addressing a Senate subcommittee in March regarding a bill that would ban asbestos in the United States, Thayer described the working conditions he and his team of pipe-fitters, welders and electricians face daily. “The tunnels are a tough place to work,” said Thayer. “Temperatures get up to 160 degrees, big slabs of concrete fall from the ceilings, and the cramped passages are thick with welding fumes, pulverized asbestos and concrete dust.” He said access to the tunnels is so limited that police patrol and emergency response are unavailable inside the tunnels.

The Architect of the Capitol has agreed to allow a tunnel employee to attend monthly meetings discussing the hazards there. Also under the agreement are provisions calling for quarterly audits and a comprehensive site management plan to correct hazards.

The Architect’s asbestos abatement is to take place over the next five years or as funding allows. The parties could also mutually agree to extend the five-year deadline for permanently correcting the situation.

Thayer’s comments on the issue in March were brought to a larger audience when the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization launched a campaign to promote awareness of the situation at the tunnel and encourage the problem to be resolved. The effort, spearheaded in April, attracted the support of a number of organizations, including the Environmental Information Association.

“The Environmental Information Association has been working with the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization over the past 15 months to expose the deplorable conditions in the tunnels controlled by the Architect of the Capitol, and the exposure of the men assigned to work in those tunnels,” said Brent Kynoch, EIA managing director, in an e-mail to IE Connections last month.

EIA signed onto an open letter condemning the Architect of the Capitol for years of inaction on the asbestos issue. It repeated Thayer’s allegation that the Architect failed to disclose to its workers facts it had known for 10 years about the severity of the occupational hazards, and that only in the spring of 2006 did the Architect require the tunnel workers to wear respirators on the job.

“We know from personal experience the lethal danger that asbestos presents because we have worked in and breathed asbestos for decades, and are now beginning to suffer the health consequences,” Thayer said in his March 1 testimony. “And if workers at the heart of the U.S. government are being put at risk, then imagine what it must be like for the millions of unseen workers in private industry.”

Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., has attempted to ban the production, manufacture and distribution of asbestos in the United States, issuing such bills each new legislative session for the last six years. EIA has backed her efforts.

“This agreement between the Office of Compliance and the Architect of the Capitol is a step in the right direction,” said Kynoch, “but it has been entirely too long in coming, and it still does not address the harm and exposure suffered by the ‘tunnel rats’ in the past.” “Tunnel rats” is a pet name safety advocates have given to the tunnel workers.

Last year, Congress pursued legislation to create a federal trust fund to resolve all claims of personal injury due to asbestos. The measure fell one vote short of passage in the Senate last February, and it again failed to pass last May when revisited.

The Architect of the Capitol agreed that its progress would be closely monitored by the Office of Compliance’s General Counsel, to ensure that all abatement milestone dates identified in the forthcoming site management plan are met.

“EIA will continue working with [the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization] to monitor the implementation of this agreement, and the anticipated repairs and asbestos abatement in the tunnels,” said Kynoch. “We will also continue to work to see that the tunnel rats who have suffered unnecessary exposures in the past are adequately compensated and fairly treated.”

Return to Top

AIHA Backs Proposal to Study NIOSH Placement

American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA)
www.aiha.org
AIHA sent a letter to Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, chairman of the chamber’s Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, to elicit his support for Congress to request a Government Accountability Office study to collect the information necessary to determine whether the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health would be best suited in the Department of Labor, or the National Institutes of Health, or maintain its current organizational structure within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

AIHA also sent the letter to the chairmen and vice chairmen of several Senate and House committees and subcommittees with appropriations control and jurisdiction over NIOSH. A study of this issue should look at the pros and cons of these alternatives and would provide NIOSH, CDC, stakeholders, and others with the information and data on how best to address the issue of occupational health and safety in today’s workplace.

There have been several recommendations regarding the organizational “home” for NIOSH. One suggestion was to move NIOSH to the Department of Labor where it could more easily interact with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Mine Safety and Health Administration, agencies that most directly receive advice and research from NIOSH.

AIHA believes a better suggestion is to retain NIOSH within the Department of Health and Human Services but move it to NIH. NIH is the primary federal agency for conducting and supporting research that leads the way in improving people’s health and saving lives. Disease prevention research within NIH is of the utmost importance to the millions of workers at risk in this country. NIH already has 27 Institutes and Centers under its umbrella, and adding NIOSH would allow NIOSH research to take advantage of the many researchers used by NIH.

Although AIHA believes moving NIOSH to NIH has merit, AIHA suggests that Congress request the GAO to conduct a study to determine whether NIOSH should remain within the organizational structure of the CDC and, if not, where it should be located.

Due to the increased national focus on public health requirements, AIHA feels that CDC may not have adequate resources to fulfill the expected challenges facing our country, as well as overseeing NIOSH and its research priorities. NIOSH has had to find several million dollars from its existing budget each of the past three years to study the health and safety impacts of nanotechnology because no direct research funding has been appropriated.

In 2004, CDC announced it was planning to reorganize CDC’s programs into four “coordinating centers” as part of the Agency’s Futures Initiative. Under the plan, NIOSH would have been placed under one of these centers. As a result of a tremendous amount of opposition to this recommendation, Congress included language in the FY 2005 omnibus budget bill recommending that CDC “maintain the status quo with respect to the direct reporting relationship of the NIOSH director to the CDC director” and that “CDC make no changes to NIOSH’s current operating procedures and organizational structure.”

This effort was somewhat successful – the NIOSH budget remained as a separate line item, and NIOSH is no longer participating in coordinator center meetings – but many concerns remain. In part, this is because these efforts addressed only a short-term fix for NIOSH. Again, in 2008, the NIOSH budget is facing a crisis as its research funding remains flat and an ever-increasing amount of the budget flows back to CDC for administrative costs.

NIOSH is the only federal agency responsible for conducting research and making recommendations for the prevention of work-related injury and illness. Created in 1970, along with OSHA, NIOSH is part of CDC in the Department of Health and Human Services. The NIOSH mission is multi-faceted. In addition to working with over 500 partners on the National Occupational Research Agenda, NIOSH supports training of occupational safety and health professionals and researchers through 16 regional Education and Research Centers and through training grants throughout the U.S.

The full text of the AIHA letter is available at www.aiha.org under “Government Affairs.”

* * *

AIHA announced today its 2007 award winners. Recipients of AIHA awards demonstrate exceptional accomplishments and provide significant contributions to the industrial hygiene and occupational and environmental health and safety (OEHS) profession. AIHA will recognize these extraordinary members at the American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Exposition (AIHce) 2007 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

“It is my pleasure to acknowledge AIHA award recipients who have performed with dedication and commitment to enhance the industrial hygiene profession,” said AIHA President Frank M. Renshaw, PhD, CIH, CSP. “The winners of these awards deserve this recognition by their peers as a result of their extraordinary accomplishments.”

Established in 1984 in honor of AIHA’s 37th president, the Edward J. Baier Technical Achievement Award is presented by Bureau Veritas. The Edward J. Baier Technical Achievement Award is presented to the individual, company, academic institution, organization, or association that has made the most significant contribution to industrial hygiene in recent years.

This year’s Baier award recipient is Paul Hewett, Ph.D., CIH, who has made significant contributions to the profession through his leadership in exposure and risk assessment. Hewett’s most recent technical contribution has been the development of Bayesian Decision Analysis tools to be used with the AIHA Exposure Assessment Strategy. BDA is a complex and powerful statistical tool that Hewett has successfully distilled into presentations and computer tools for use by the practicing industrial hygienist.

The Edward J. Baier Technical Achievement Award was to be presented at the AIHA annual business meeting on Thursday, June 7. The Donald E. Cummings Memorial Award was established in 1943 as a tribute to AIHA’s third president. It is given for outstanding contributions to the knowledge and practice of the industrial hygiene profession.

This year’s Cummings award recipient is Howard J. Cohen, Ph.D., CIH, professor and chairperson of the Occupational Safety and Health Management Department of the University of New Haven. Cohen most recently served as a member of the Institute of Medicine review committee, which is evaluating the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health efforts to update the criteria used for anthropometric sizing for respirator selection. He is also a member of the IOM committee developing guidelines relative to respiratory protection against avian flu.

The Donald E. Cummings Memorial Award was to be presented at the general session on Monday, June 4.

The AIHA Distinguished Service Award was established in 1978 to recognize distinguished service in the advancement of industrial hygiene and to recognize unique technical contributions that align with the goals of AIHA. The basis for selection includes accomplishments with excellence in any aspect of industrial hygiene.

This year’s recipient is Nick D. Yin, CIH, CSP. He has more than 30 years of service to the industrial hygiene profession and was instrumental in establishing a solid relationship between AIHA and the Chinese Occupational Safety and Health Association. He has been serving as AIHA’s Ambassador to China since 1996. Yin is also honored for the creation of the AIHA Methods Information Exchange Network. The AIHA Distinguished Service Award was to be presented at the AIHA annual business meeting on Thursday, June 7.

The Kusnetz Award was established in 1987 and is named for its donors, Florence Kusnetz and AIHA Past President Howard Kusnetz. This award honors a certified industrial hygienist who is under 40 years old, is employed in the private sector, and exhibits high ethical standards and technical abilities in the OEHS profession.

Shelley Wheeling-Park, MPH, CHMM, CSP, CIH, represents the true intention of the award by providing services to ensure the health and safety protection of more than 4,500 employees at Kaiser Permanente. Her responsibilities span a breadth of services and include oversight of the industrial hygiene program, waste management, transportation of hazardous materials, safety inspections and audits, JCAHO Environment of Care program, construction safety management, and various environmental health and safety programs.

The Kusnetz Award will be presented at the AIHA annual business meeting on Thursday, June 7.

The Alice Hamilton Award was established in 1993 by the AIHA Board of Directors. With the first award granted in 1995, the Alice Hamilton Award is presented to an outstanding woman who has made a definite, lasting achievement in the field of occupational hygiene through public and community service; social reform; technological innovation; or advancements in the scientific approach to the recognition, evaluation, and control of workplace hazards.

This year’s Alice Hamilton award winner is Martha A. Waters, Ph.D., CIH, a contributor to the profession of industrial hygiene since her entry into the field via chemistry. Her long list of varied work experience, publications, committee service, and honors shows the breadth of her knowledge and expertise in the field. She has been active in the profession and a mentor and contributor at many levels. The Alice Hamilton Award was to be presented at the General Session on Monday, June 4. The William P. Yant Award was established in 1964 to commemorate the leadership and contributions to industrial hygiene of AIHA’s first president. Sponsored by the Mine Safety Appliances Company, the award is presented for outstanding contributions in industrial hygiene or allied fields to an individual residing outside the United States.

This year’s Yant award winner is Nam Won Paik, DrPH, CIH, founder of the Korean Industrial Hygiene Association and a leading figure in the promotion and development of occupational hygiene worldwide. Paik is a scholar, a global leader, an innovator, and a person who has always practiced industrial hygiene according to the American Board of Industrial Hygiene Code of Ethics.

The William P. Yant Award was to be presented at the general session on Monday, June 4.

Restoration Industry Association (RIA)
www.restorationindustry.org

At its 62nd Annual Convention and Exhibition in Orlando, Fla., the Restoration Industry Association (formerly ASCR) announced its slate of officers for 2007.

Gary Dooner, CR, of Du All Service Contractors Inc. (Minneapolis, Minn.) will serve as RIA president, succeeding Brian Spiegel, CR, of Spiegel Certified Restoration (Montclair, Calif.), who will serve as immediate past president. Du All Service Contractors has been involved in the restoration industry for 40 years, providing 24-hour response to fire, smoke and water damaged residential, commercial and industrial structures and their contents. Active in the industry for 25 years, Dooner holds the unique distinction of being one of the first 100 Certified Restorer designees certified by RIA. He was a recipient of the Martin L. King award in 2003, which recognizes outstanding service to the restoration industry. Dooner is also actively involved in his local community, and served as a former director of the Viet Nam Veterans Leadership Committee. He is a member of the Military Order of the Purple Heart and the Marine Corps Association.

Ben Yanker, CR, WLS, CMH, of Buffalo Restoration Inc. (Bozeman, Mont.) will be the association vice president. Graham Dick, CMP, of Genesis Restorations Ltd. (Surrey, BC) will serve as the secretary. Ron Reese, CR, WLS, of Ree Construction (Bellevue, Idaho), will serve as treasurer.

Also serving on the board of directors are Michael Griggs, CR, WLS, of Disaster Restoration Inc. (Denver, Colo.); Bill Lakin, CR, of Chem-Dry (Stafford, England); and Jeff Jones, CRS, of Sani-Sheen System Inc. (Oklahoma City, Okla.).

American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)
www.ashrae.org

ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2007, “Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality,” sets minimum ventilation rates and other requirements for commercial and institutional buildings.

“Standard 62.1 has served the building industry and the public as the most prominent standard on ventilation for indoor air quality,” said Dennis Stanke, committee chair. “Changes in the 2007 standard build on the improvements published in the 2004 version, providing additional guidance for designers of building ventilation systems.”

The new standard includes requirements for the separation of areas with environmental tobacco smoke from areas without ETS in the same building. Although some local building and health codes prohibit smoking indoors in many buildings and locations, other codes allow smoking in designated areas. In buildings that allow smoking in designated areas, effective separation of ETS areas ensures “ETS-free” areas contain little or no ETS-related contaminants. The new separation requirements help designers ensure effective separation, according to Stanke.

Another change clarifies of how designers must analyze mechanical cooling systems to help limit space relative humidity. Many buildings suffer from air quality problems related to dampness, including mold and other microbial growth. In the past, the standard required a design analysis at specified load conditions, in an effort to demonstrate that a given design approach in a given climate could successfully limit space RH to 65 percent or less.

“Those load conditions could be confusing and difficult to establish,” Stanke said. “The new requirements include a specific easy-to-establish load condition. Each system must be analyzed to check its dehumidification performance at this challenging condition to help designers make system configuration and control choices that reduce the likelihood of high-humidity problems in buildings.” Other changes include:

  • Additions to Table 6-1 of minimum outdoor air requirements for dwelling units in high-rise residential buildings. These requirements apply to residences in buildings over three stories. Low-rise residential buildings are covered by ASHRAE Standard 62.2, Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air Quality in Low-Rise Residential Buildings.
  • New or previously overlooked occupancy categories. In response to proposed changes from users of the standard, ASHRAE added several occupancy categories to Table 6-1 with associated minimum outdoor air rates. These include, for example, daycare sickrooms, university/college laboratories, break rooms and coffee stations, and laundry rooms.


* * *

ASHRAE will play a primary role in former President Bill Clinton’s initiative to reduce energy consumption in existing buildings by providing design guidance and tools to reach energy efficiency targets.

On May 16, Clinton announced the creation of a global Energy Efficiency Building Retrofit Program, a project of the Clinton Climate Initiative. This program brings together four of the world’s largest energy service companies, five of the world’s largest banks, and 16 of the world’s largest cities in a landmark program designed to reduce energy consumption in existing buildings.

CCI and its partners – including ASHRAE and the U.S. Green Building Council – will assist participating cities with their initiation and development of programs to train local workers on the installation and maintenance of energy saving and clean energy products. “Climate change is a global problem that requires local action,” said Clinton. “The businesses, banks and cities partnering with my foundation are addressing the issue of global warming because it’s the right thing to do, but also because it’s good for their bottom line. They’re going to save money, make money, create jobs and have a tremendous collective impact on climate change all at once. I’m proud of them for showing leadership on the critical issue of climate change, and I thank them for their commitment to this new initiative.” “ASHRAE is in the best position to provide immediate support to the cities seeking guidance through the Clinton Climate Initiative due to our 30-year involvement in design guidance for energy conservation for both new and existing buildings,” said ASHRAE President Terry Townsend.

Townsend notes that most guidance developed for the HVAC&R industry focuses on new construction, which represents only 2 percent of the building stock in the United States.

“We must broaden our focus to include existing buildings, which accounts for the other 98 percent,” he said. As such, ASHRAE currently is working to provide energy guidance in existing buildings through its Advanced Energy Design Guide series. This existing buildings guide, developed in collaboration with the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America and the U.S. Green Building Council with participation by BOMA and the U.S. General Service Administration, will show building owners how they can initially reduce their energy consumption by 30 percent. It is tentatively scheduled to be available in fall 2008.

ASHRAE also provides guidance through its Standard 100, Energy Conservation in Buildings, which provides procedures and programs essential to energy-conserving operation, maintenance and monitoring, and Standard 90.1, Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings.

The Energy Efficiency Building Retrofit Program will provide both cities and their private building owners with access to the necessary funds to retrofit existing buildings with more energy efficient products, typically leading to energy savings between 20 to 50 percent. Those involved include:

  • Honeywell, Johnson Controls, Inc, Siemens and Trane will conduct energy audits, perform building retrofits, and guarantee the energy savings of the retrofit projects.
  • Citibank, UBS, Deutsche Bank, ABN AMRO, and JP Morgan have agreed in principle to commit to arrange $1 billion each to finance cities and private building owners to undertake these retrofits at no capital cost, doubling the global market for energy retrofit in buildings.
  • These banks will work alongside energy efficiency finance specialist Hannon Armstrong and CCI to develop effective mechanisms to deploy this capital globally.
  • An initial group of 16 of the world’s largest cities has agreed to participate in the retrofit program, and offer their municipal buildings for the first round of energy retrofits: New York, Chicago, Houston, Toronto, Mexico City, London, Berlin, Johannesburg, Delhi, Mumbai, Karachi, Tokyo, Seoul, Sao Paulo, Bangkok, and Melbourne.

American Industrial Hygiene Foundation (AIHF)
AIHF’s 2007 scholarship winners were to be announced formally on Tuesday, June 5, during the general session at the American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Exposition in Philadelphia, Pa.

AIHF is a nonprofit organization formed by the American Industrial Hygiene Association to award scholarships to students studying industrial hygiene and related disciplines.

AIHF would like to congratulate the following students:

  • Richard Neitzel, University of Washington, AIHA Scholarship
  • Khadeeja Abdullah, University of California at Los Angeles, AIHF Scholarship
  • John Breskey, University of Illinois at Chicago, AIHF Scholarship
  • Loren Kaehn, University of Washington, AIHF Scholarship
  • Reginald Richards, George Washington University, AIHA Local Section Scholarship
  • Michael Humann, University of Iowa, Clyde M. Berry Scholarship
  • Phillip Clark, Colorado State University, Larry R. Birkner & Ruth K. McIntyre-Birkner Memorial Scholarship and Robert L. Harris Scholarship
  • Gustavo Serrano Izaguirre, University of Michigan, George & Florence Clayton Scholarship
  • Chad Brenneman, University of Cincinnati, Kyle B. Dotson Scholarship
  • Zulma Machillanda-Hahn, University of California at Berkeley, Jeffrey S. Lee Memorial Scholarship and Jerry Lynch Memorial Scholarship
  • Celeste Hemphill, University of Cincinnati, Liberty Mutual Scholarship
  • Ramona Lall, New York University, Morton Lippmann Scholarship
  • Jennifer Hsu, University of Michigan, Michigan Industrial Hygiene Society Merit Scholarship
  • Pamela Dopart, University of Michigan, Ralph G. Smith Memorial Scholarship
  • J. Girard Griggs, University of Minnesota, TSI / Arthur J. Abrams Memorial Scholarship
  • Coty Maypole, University of Texas, Ralph J. Vernon Memorial Scholarship
  • Beauregard Middaugh, Purdue University, Chicago Local Section Scholarship


Since 1982, AIHF has distributed more than $900,000 to 356 students at 45 schools and universities. These scholarships have enabled talented students to complete their education and have encouraged the most promising scholars to enter or remain in the industrial hygiene profession.

Students are evaluated on academic record, extracurricular activities, future goals as an industrial hygienist, and potential for leadership in the industrial hygiene profession. Scholarships are awarded based on the availability of funds provided through contributions from AIHA members, individuals, corporations, and local sections to the AIHF endowment fund.

For the 2007–2008 academic year, 19 scholarships will be awarded to students totaling $54,100. One of those scholarships was funded by the Chicago Local Section.

Return to Top

Snake Oil or Good Science
Richard J. Shaughnessy, Ph.D.
Program Director
University of Tulsa Indoor Air Program Tulsa, Okla.

Bradley Turk
President Environmental Building Sciences Inc.

Las Vegas, N.M.

The field of indoor air quality is experiencing growing pains. For one, we are seeing the hyperbole of products that promise to render our lives free of air pollutants; however, in retrospect, which of these rings true in our own measure of what is necessary to secure incremental improvements to the indoor air we breathe? Now is a good time for a reality check to try to recall why we are doing what we do. Is it for enriching one’s soul, the quixotic belief we can and are making a difference in the lives of others, the betterment of one’s pocketbook, or a combination of all the above? Frankly, most of us probably got into the field because we wanted to do some good but don’t mind being able to earn a living while doing so. But let’s not equivocate – our labors should be directed to striving for advances that improve the health of our population as the bottom-line outcome.

Whereas the field of indoor air continues to expand, we must ask ourselves if “expansion” is being driven by the accretion of knowledge and lessons learned from the past, or by the present drive to sell more stuff by flooding the market with more and more questionable products. For scientists, researchers and informed practitioners, the answers to this question can bring about a sense of frustration and disillusionment. Policy and agendas being driven by politics, public messages being ultimately constructed based on private investments, and truth being obscured by misdirection all are commonplace in today’s burgeoning field of what we know as indoor air quality. This has apparently been good for business since it was recently reported that expenditures for IAQ prevention and mitigation conservatively total up to $20 billion dollars annually in the U.S. alone.

If, at times, the options appear overwhelming for the informed advocate, what must one think of the common layperson on the street with the unenviable task of making choices to improve his or her own environment? The general public wants to buy into the advertisements and hype associated with the product/services being sold. However, their ability to decipher the ad jargon is built upon the presumption that the product is doing what it says it will.

Therein lays the dilemma. So many substandard products on the market have associated claims that are crafted by adroit and cunning sales ad marketers that are extremely proficient in making the most banal devices such as a toaster sound as if they are a gift from the heavens above. Combine this with the quandary that there is little, if any, oversight by the government or consumer awareness groups as to the veracity of these claims, and one has a dangerous synergy that propagates the marketing of substandard products that may in fact do more harm than good.

As a case in point, the clear guidance now being imparted by scientists is that there is no safe threshold for ozone levels in the indoor environment. Recent research has demonstrated that outdoor ozone concentrations below the National Ambient Air Quality Standards have been associated with severe wheezing and difficulty breathing in infants and susceptible populations. Short-term exposure to increased ozone concentrations (as low as 10 ppb increases) have also been linked to premature mortality. Many scientists have hypothesized that the adverse health effects observed in the recent epidemiological studies of outdoor ozone are more directly linked with exposure to the products of ozone-initiated indoor chemistry, as opposed to exposure to outdoor ozone itself. So, in addition to the health detriments attributable to ozone alone, these recent studies have indicated that any increase in indoor ozone concentrations results in chemical reactions that lead to the formation of products that are more irritating and damaging than the precursor components to the reaction. With the abundance of research and relevant findings in this area, would it surprise any of the practitioners in the field that the market is still bursting with old and new products – ionizers, air “purifiers,” etc. – that inevitably add significant concentrations of ozone to the indoor space? Probably not.

There are many other examples of IAQ products that 1) have little or no significant benefit to the control of indoor contaminants, and, most egregiously, 2) result in an actual detriment to the health of the poorly advised consumer. Where are we going wrong? Air fresheners that add to the problem; air cleaners that do little, if anything, to clean the air; source control products that only substitute one problem for another, photocatalytic/ultraviolet/biocidal/neutralizer/hypoallergenic/miracle/odor-free/dust-free/mold-deterrent products that are sure to replace our need to ever maintain, clean or attend to our systems in our lifetime again.

In addition to thoughtful design and procurement, and careful construction and installation, it is precisely that need to maintain/clean/attend that is tantamount in attaining an improved environment. There is and never will be a replacement to such common sense that must prevail should we ever hope to make environmental health advances in our lives and those of our children. Dollars aside, the need to reestablish these indispensable steps of improving our IAQ must be re-instilled in our thought process should we ever hope to succeed. There will never be a replacement for source control, improved ventilation, and sound, proven approaches to air cleaning.

The situation we’ve described is reminiscent of the snake-oil salesmen of yesteryear. This age-old problem of con men, shysters, and those just trying to scratch out a living will never go away. We can’t entirely rely on – or want – government oversight and regulation. We must police ourselves and our industry, keeping in mind our reasons for being involved in the field and maintaining high ethical standards. We all have our own role and responsibility as product developers, salespeople and service providers, and scientists and researchers. As scientists, we are frustrated at not being able to keep up with the consumer’s need for accurate information, and for not providing the scientific research basis for practitioners and industry to make sound decisions as to how to proceed. While there is always a healthy tension between research/science that is driven by practice/industry versus industry being driven by science, there has been a breakdown in our ability as scientists to render the practical aspects to industry to make sound decisions for the betterment of IAQ. ASHRAE, AIHA, IAQA, ISIAQ and other leading member/research-based organizations (with the help of academic institutions across this country and internationally) must prioritize their agendas to provide the bridge from theoretical scientific findings to practitioner-based tools that can better the indoor environment.

This is no easy task and will not occur overnight; however, there has been an abundance of new research that, it is hoped, will play a central role as to how we proceed in the future. The re-infusion of science into the most grassroots of messages that go out to the public is crucial for our own subsistence and credibility. Sustainable indoor environments that foster improved indoor air for the health benefit of exposed populations are at risk unless they are based on good science and the underappreciated virtue of oft-forgotten common sense.

Dr. Richard J. Shaughnessy, a member of the IE Connections Editorial Advisory Board, received a doctorate degree in chemical engineering and has served as program director of IAQ research at the University of Tulsa since 1987. He has published extensively with respect to his studies on particulate research, air cleaner evaluation, indoor chemistry, school studies, flooring studies, asthma/housing research, and resolution and remediation of bioaerosol-related problems. He is currently furthering research studying the association between IAQ and student performance. Shaughnessy can be reached by e-mail at rjstulsau@aol.com.

Bradley Turk is a building scientist and president of Environmental Building Sciences Inc. in New Mexico, with over 30 years of experience in indoor environmental quality and energy management. He has performed investigations in problem buildings, conducted basic research in building air quality and energy efficiency, and developed IEQ training materials and programs.

Return to Top

Avoiding Possible IAQ Problems in the Summer
William A. Turner, P.E.
President/CEO
Turner Building Science & Design LLC
Concord, N.H.

Steve M. Caulfield, P.E., CIH
Senior Vice President
Turner Building Science & Design LLC
Harrison, Maine


Some common and potentially recurring IAQ problems in schools encountered during hot and humid summer weather have to do with both occupied facilities and unoccupied facilities that have been shut down for the season. Let’s look at a few specific examples and possible means of addressing these conditions so that things might go more smoothly. We’ll start in the basement and work towards the rooftop HVAC.

Avoiding Condensation in Basements and Other Earth-contact Areas

With all the hype regarding mold amplification in buildings and its likely relationship to asthma and allergy exacerbation, many schools now understand that finding mold growing on paper or wood materials deep within the bowels of the facility is not a good thing. The likely scenario is a school built on a sloped site with a walkout basement and a back wall uphill that is 12 feet or so below the earth. One can make the scenario even more prevalent with an exterior footer drain that runs like a faucet with a water temperature in the range of 55 degrees Fahrenheit. Rest assured that if the warm humid air outdoors gets to the wall that has a surface temperature of 60 degrees during the heat of summer, mold will be growing somewhere. This principle also applies to deep crawlspaces that are nice and cold, and, sometimes, to slabs. Let’s look at each type of area.

Cold basement walls well below grade: We know of only three possible fixes for these areas.
  1. Leave the moist cold concrete walls and floors exposed and run a high capacity commercial dehumidifier (such as a Thermastor unit, which gets you 140 pints of water a day for 10 amps of power) and drain it to a sump.
     
  2. Somehow heat the area to a surface temperature clearly above the dewpoint temperature. (Good luck warming up earth-contact concrete unless it’s a radiant heated floor.) These above two principles apply to tunnels and cold boiler rooms also.
     
  3. If it applies, make the area an improvement or betterment project and properly insulate the room walls and floors from the cold concrete with suitable permeable foam sheeting and suitable non-cellulose based interior finish materials, and you still may need a dehumidifier depending on the climate and the specifics of the moisture saturation in the concrete. While you are doing all this, remember to not make the mistake of putting conventional carpeting down over a damp basement floor (or a floor that has a high vapor-emission rate).
Cold, damp crawlspaces located below grade: Assuming the crawlspace is only used for access to utilities and not used for storage, there are a variety of fixes, depending on one’s climate and budget. It’s pretty much now advised that crawlspaces should not be vented by outdoor air in the summer time as the outdoor air only wets the cold crawlspace vs. helping to dry it out (i.e., vent it in the winter if you can afford to waste the heat but not in the summer). The current advice for crawlspaces is warm and dry, treat it like a basement, detailed above. That said, if you are stuck with a three- to eight-foot-high crawlspace, there are some reasonable approaches that we have found to work well.
  1. Figure out how to drain away any standing water, or raise the level of the crawlspace floor above the standing water if the groundwater cannot be lowered and you have room to raise the floor. Grout mixtures will work and are deliverable by a concrete company and affordable.
     
  2. Once you know you have the floor of the crawlspace above the seasonal high-water table, a radon-type sub-membrane venting system can be installed by most local radon-mitigation contractors. Remember to use a suitable smoke and flame-rated high-strength poly sheeting (typically used for scaffolding) and fasten the poly well at the perimeter and at all columns. Yes, clean out all the junk in the crawlspace first.
     
  3. Once you have the moisture from under the poly and the walls captured by the radon exhaust fan, the final phase is to locate a high-capacity dehumidifier, designed for crawlspaces, within the crawlspace to keep it dry from any dampness that arrives from outdoor air. Again, a Thermastor or similar, high capacity, high efficiency unit made for crawlspaces should work well, just run the drainhose to a capped sump and pump it out, if you leave it to evaporate, you are not really removing it from the space, which is the mission. 4.) If you are in a cold climate budget some funds to insulate the walls of the crawlspace now or at some point in the future, with a suitable insulation material that does not absorb moisture, and is protected from ignition.
Cold slab-on-grade floors: Assuming you are in a cold or cool climate, an un-insulated floor slab can also be a problem in the summer regarding condensation. These can be especially challenging if covered with jute-backed carpets or flow-through carpets of any type for that matter. Likely, the smartest thing to do is if you must extract the carpets in the summer months is to do it only under very defined conditions so that you know adequate 24-hour drying will occur. The most reliable method we know of is carefully high-temperature-extracting the carpet (not shampooing), not wetting it too much, and immediately running a high capacity dehumidifier in the closed up room for 24 hours, monitoring the humidity in the room, and confirming that the carpet is very dry within the 24 hours. Running air conditioning in the room will seldom dry it because usually there is not enough load and, at best AC, will give you 55 percent relative-humidity air and you are trying to create air that is dryer than 50 percent RH to evaporate any residual dampness from the carpet fast enough to keep the garden of mold from sprouting. Remember that all of the water you put into the carpet will evaporate into the room, raising the humidity significantly. So, don’t skimp on the extraction and get as much water out as soon as possible. If its jute backed (or any flow-through type) and you over-wet it, then it’s likely that you cannot dry it fast enough and risk mold amplification within the carpet backing itself.

#2 Summer HVAC Operation
Summer operation of HVAC systems in a partially or mostly vacant school can be a real challenge depending on the HVAC system design. Perhaps the first step is figuring our what zoning you have and what type of HVAC equipment. DX equipment without various stages of cooling in a partially occupied zone can be a real challenge. If the systems short cycles without enough load on it, you can actually end up having a cool and clammy room, with very high humidity being created by the operation of the AC. If it’s a chiller running cold water to a coil, similar problems can occur if full outside air is supplied to a partially or lightly occupied zone. This results in cooling the space without removing the humidity, leading to condensation, possible mold, and other issues resulting from very elevated humidity. If the occupants cannot be located in one zone in order to put a heavy loading on the cooling system, one may have to look into adding supplemental dehumidification to the area, yes with a high-capacity commercial dehumidifier.

If you are running AC somewhere, there’s a condensate drain pan that must be managed to be kept clean or at least clean enough that you would not mind eating your lunch out of it if you had to. Come up with some type of maintenance plan that keeps the pan from becoming a swamp of stagnant water. While you’re looking at the drain pan or servicing it, what does the acoustical liner in the HVAC unit near the condensate pan look like? Clean, moldy, falling apart, or missing? There are several materials that can be used to replace a disintegrating liner to keep from releasing fiberglass into the air stream or to keep a mold farm from reoccurring.

Roof Drains, Floor Drain Traps, Sink Drain Traps, and Grease Traps
Make sure the roof drain strainers aren’t blocked, making a downpour potentially a big problem. To avoid sewer gas problems make sure the floor drains and any unused sinks have water or some other suitable liquid in the traps. Don’t forget the grease traps in the art room or kitchen must be serviced and be kept sealed air-tight.

Conclusion
Summer is a challenging time with high-humidity in many parts of the USA and consequently, high condensation potential, and low drying potential. Add to this that schools often need to do much of their heavy cleaning during this shut down and you have the ingredients for inadvertent mold growth. Remember to manage the moisture appropriately, and, hopefully, you can avoid being a mushroom farmer when its time to reopen in the fall.

William A. Turner, P.E., is president and CEO of Turner Building Science & Design LLC. He has more than 25 years of experience in IAQ/HVAC evaluation and development of solutions for building system problems. He supervises a group of engineers, industrial hygienists and building scientists who serve owners, architects, general contractors and construction managers. Turner can be reached by e-mail at bturner@turnerbuildingscience.com or by phone at (207) 583-4571 ext. 11. Steve M. Caulfield, P.E., CIH, is senior vice president of Turner Building Science. Caulfield can be reached by e-mail at scaulfield@turnerbuildingscience.com or by phone at (207) 583-4571 ext. 14.

Return to Top

AvBenefits of Applying Moldiness Index Abound
Dr. King-Teh Lin
Laboratory Director
Mycometrics LLC
Monmouth Junction, N.J.


Despite molds in the indoor environment having been a growing public concern, there have been no standardized, objective methods available to quantify the indoor mold burden in homes. I believe this situation has now been corrected with the development of mold-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction, or MSQPCR, and its application, called the environmental relative moldiness index.

MSQPCR is an objective, standardized DNA-based method of mold analysis developed by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency scientists to identify and quantify molds. Last year, the Department of Housing and Urban Development used this technology to complete the American Healthy Homes Survey. Based on this national survey and MSQPCR, analysis of the settled dust in the homes in locations across the United States, a national environmental relative moldiness index, or ERMI, was developed.

In HUD’s survey, dust was collected in 1,096 homes by vacuuming two square meters in the living room and bedroom for five minutes each with a dust sampler-fitted vacuum. This is approximately 18 square feet in each room. Each sample was then mixed and sieved through a 300-micron pore, nylon mesh screen. The samples were analyzed by an EPA-licensed laboratory for 36 indicator species of molds.

What is the ERMI?
The 36 indicator species that make up the ERMI were chosen because they can be found at relatively high concentrations in homes throughout the United States. This is not to say that there are no other species that are unique or important in different climates or locations; rather, these 36 indicator species are common enough to be predictive of the total mold burden. The goal is to measure enough species to allow the laboratory to describe the relative mold burden in homes anywhere in the country.

As shown in Table 1 on page ___, these 36 species were categorized into two groups. The first group includes 26 species/clusters associated with water-damaged homes. The other group is comprised of 10 common species or clusters not specific to water-damaged homes. In HUD’s survey, the ERMI was computed for each home by taking the sum of the log-transformed concentrations of each of the Group 1 molds minus the sum of the log-transformed concentrations of the Group 2 molds. (The concentration of the Group 2 species is subtracted from the Group 1 species in order to adjust for variations in cleaning habits.)

To produce the ERMI scale, the computed ERMI values for all 1,096 homes were assembled on a continuum from lowest to highest. The scale ranges from about -10 to about 20, or even higher, as shown in the sample ERMI report shown in Figure 1 on page ___. On the left-hand side of the scale, the 25 percent of the homes with the lowest concentrations of molds in the ERMI analysis have an ERMI value less than -4. Homes within this low range have the lowest mold burden. The homes in upper quartile have ERMI values of five or higher. Generally, homes within this high range are considered to have the highest potential risk of exposure to molds associated with water-damaged indoor environments.

The ERMI scale is not meant as a method of making fine separations, since the standard deviation for any ERMI value is plus or minus three. For example, the 95 percent confidence interval for an ERMI of 14 would be from 11 to 17 – i.e., 14 plus or minus three. So, for example, an ERMI value of 14 is not significantly different from an ERMI value of 15, or an ERMI of two versus zero.

Using the ERMI for Medical Questions
The ERMI scale was derived from the analysis of the settled dust in the common living room plus one bedroom of a home; for proper comparison with the HUD survey data, the ERMI samples should be taken in these same areas. However, dust samples can be taken anywhere for analysis, and the inspector’s expertise should direct that. There is just more uncertainty as one moves away from the locations that were used to build the ERMI scale. Here are some examples of how the ERMI is being used.

“If a person is not feeling well and his or her doctor has determined that sensitivity to mold is an issue to explore, then an ERMI analysis of the patient’s home is a good place to start,” explained Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, a family practice physician in Maryland who specializes in mold exposures. While the ERMI is a mold index and not a health index, Shoemaker said that whenever the ERMI is elevated, “you may suspect mold trouble.” If the ERMI is low and there are people in the home with a typical mold illness, consider repeating the ERMI in different areas. If the ERMI is low and no one is ill, your sense of security increases.

An ERMI analysis might help you to determine if your home is safe for visitors who might have a genetic susceptibility to mold. “If the ERMI value [is above five, which] suggests the home is in the upper 25 percent of the scale, then an investigation for water damage could be health-saving,” said Shoemaker.

He tells of “a Massachusetts mother who found that her home was terribly contaminated, even without visible mold, musty smells or abnormal air sampling from two prior mold inspectors. She says to this day that ERMI saved her children’s lives. Maybe that is too much credit, but the truth is that her family only now is well.”

The Institute of Medicine’s 2004 report “Damp Indoor Spaces and Health” expressed the opinion that there was sufficient evidence of an association between molds or other agents in damp indoor environments with asthma symptoms in sensitized people. Each person varies so much genetically that a level of mold burden for one person may cause asthma symptoms but not affect another person at all. Medical questions should always be left to the medical professionals. The ERMI value is just one more piece of information that a physician might use to help in a diagnosis.

For example, a study conducted of asthmatic children in Cleveland by CASE Medical School used ERMI testing to document the mold burden in each home. After remediation of the water damage and mold, the children experienced a significant reduction in their need for medical intervention for their asthma. In a prospective study of atopic infants, measuring the mold burden with MSQPCR was found to be a better predictor for development of wheeze/rhinitis than the visual home inspection for mold.

Using the ERMI to Locate Mold Problems
Derrick A. Denis, a Council-certified indoor environmental consultant in Arizona, suggests that one should “consider what is your mold-related question and which of the sampling methodologies and analyses will most accurately answer your question.” He uses MSQPCR as one more tool in his mold-inspection toolbox of sampling methodologies for IAQ investigations. “Each of the sampling methods available has strengths and weaknesses, as well as costs,” he said. “An ERMI analysis can give a homebuyer a warning that there was an historic unknown or undisclosed water problem with mold growth in the home, or the ERMI can provide peace of mind that the relative mold burden in the home does not indicate a history of water intrusion.”

“Some caution in the use of ERMI is necessary because of conditions that can affect the outcome of sampling,” advised Greg Boothe, a certified industrial hygienist in Tennessee who uses ERMI as an effective screening tool to direct further investigation in both residential and commercial settings. “Investigators must consider the condition and activities related to the sampling surfaces in areas selected for ERMI analysis,” said Boothe. New carpet and carpet that has recently been professionally cleaned may not reflect the true historical burden of mold in the building.

Gil Cormier, a certified industrial hygienist in Connecticut, has used the ERMI for evaluating carpeting in schools. “We were able to use the ERMI to evaluate carpeting and compare rooms with suspected moisture problems with rooms with no known moisture problems,” he said.

Advantages of ERMI
Traditional air sampling has never been standardized; thus, interpretations of the results are always problematic. The major problem with traditional air samples are that they are necessarily of a short duration. Often, air samples are taken for only a few minutes because the recovery source, whether a Petri dish or a sticky slide, is quickly overloaded. However, air samples can be useful and, if properly taken, can also be analyzed by MSQPCR.

Air samples can be useful, especially in hospitals or in an effort to pinpoint the location of a hidden mold problem, as Steven Vesper and others note in a 2004 paper published in the Journal of Hospital Infection. In order to take air samples for MSQPCR analysis, the collection medium is a 25 or 37 mm diameter polycarbonate filter with either 0.45- or 0.8-micron pore size. The flow rate can range from two to 16 liters per minute. The holder for the filter can be a button, sampler, cassette, or any other holder suitable for the filter. Sampling can be accomplished using either a personal or area sampling pump. The great thing about MSQPCR analysis is that the filter cannot be overloaded, meaning air samples can be taken for prolonged periods such as many hours or even days. But the best part is that you don’t have to wait days to weeks for your results. However, there is no ERMI scale for air samples.

Sampling for the ERMI?
Sampling dust for the ERMI analysis is fairly simple. Start by locating the most commonly used area in the living room. Using a tape measure and masking tape, mark a three-foot by six-foot sampling area on the floor. If the sample location cannot accommodate a sample area of these dimensions, then adjust the dimensions accordingly. Record these dimensions and note where you took the sample for later comparison, if necessary. Next, do the same in the main bedroom.

Then take the protective caps off the holder and insert the filter into the holder and attach it to the vacuum cleaner hose. Vacuum for five minutes in each area, pull out the sampler and cap it. As a rule-of-thumb, the filter should be generally about half full when you are finished. If there is very little dust, then you will want to vacuum for a longer time or over a larger surface area and note this on the chain-of-custody form. Send each of the samples in a sealed bag for an ERMI analysis to an EPA-licensed ERMI laboratory. Your results can be ready in as little as 24 hours.

If the ERMI value is high, then you may want to analyze other areas in order to help find the water damage that is the source of the mold. A basement, if there is one, can be a common source of water-damage molds, and a sample can be taken there. However, once it is clear that there is water damage in the environment, other devices like infrared cameras or moisture meters or even mold-sniffing dogs may help to locate the problem.

When evaluating buildings other than homes, the difficulty is deciding where to take samples. It may be that multiple samples will be required. The experienced inspector will look at the HVAC system and make an educated guess about where to sample. One should take dust samples of an area equivalent to that used in the home investigation. Collecting dust from other available surface areas such as a shelf, cabinet, etc., with available settled dust can be an alternative, if no appropriate floor surface is available.

Since no ERMI scale has been developed for other types of buildings, one can only relate the analysis back to the home ERMI. Thus, an office with an ERMI of 14 would be like saying the office environment would be equivalent to a home in the top 25 percent of homes in the United States for relative mold burden. Additional samples, even air samples, may help pinpoint the mold’s location.

Another time to use the ERMI is before and after remediation. After fixing the water problem and removing the mold contaminated materials, it is important that the entire home be thoroughly cleaned. You can then repeat the ERMI sampling and analysis to ensure post-abatement verification. There should be a significant reduction in the ERMI value. However, it may take some weeks to months before the ERMI returns to pre-water-damaged mold levels.

No sampling can replace the wisdom of experience in finding and dealing with mold problems in buildings and ERMI can be a helpful tool. As further research documents the ERMI’s applications, it can improve lives.

Summary
We know that all indoor environments contain some mold, but not all contain the same molds and definitely not at the same concentrations. Identification and accurate quantitation of indoor molds to the species level is now available using a DNA-based analysis, MSQPCR. This automated analysis provides rapid, reproducible results that can be reliably interpreted. For patients, prospective homebuyers, industrial hygienists and remediators alike, ERMI shows great promise to help us all.

King-Teh Lin is laboratory director for Mycometrics LLC. He earned a doctorate degree from Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and, soon after his postdoctoral fellowship, continued as a faculty member until being recruited by P&K Microbiology Services as a director of research and development. There, he pioneered commercialization of MSQPCR and invented the new DNA testing for wood-decaying fungi. In 2005, he established Mycometrics to provide microbiology testing services. Lin can be reached by e-mail at kingteh@mycometrics.com or by phone at (732) 355-9018.

Return to Top

Contact Us At
Indoor Environment Connections
12339 Carroll Avenue
Rockville, MD 20852
(301) 230-9606 | (301) 230-9631 (fax)
E-mail: IECnews@aol.com

Copyright © 1999-2007. Indoor Environment Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This site is maintained by Webfoot.Net. and may be contacted at webmaster@webfoot.net