| The first
half of 2000 has been a public relations
nightmare for the air duct cleaning industry.
Negative stories have appeared in the press
nationwide. While the direct impact on the duct
cleaning industry is hard to assess, articles
warning consumers against cleaning ducts can't be
good for business.
In March, in conjunction with the American
Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI)
Annual Meeting, the association put out a press
release reporting on a study by Amy Tsay of
Indoor Biotechnologies. "Cleaning ducts has
no significant improvement on allergic
symptoms," concludes the Charlottesville,
Va., researcher. The AAAAI press release was
picked up by Reuters and hit the mainstream press
on March 6. The story made its way into national
and local newspapers, as well as the internet on
sites like www.HealthCentral.com.
Two months later another damaging article
appeared in U.S. News and World Report. The May
8, 2000 issue's cover story was titled "The
Allergy Explosion and What You Can Do About
It." Within the feature article, a two-page
sidebar gave advice on steps to eliminate
potential allergy and asthma triggers in the
home. "Don't bother cleaning your air
ducts," advised the magazine. It cited a
University of Cincinnati researcher who warned,
"People see what's in the ducts and say,
'Oh, that's what I've been breathing in.' The
answer is no. That's what's been sitting in your
air ducts."
Researchers, government officials and those in
the IAQ field have been asking whether air duct
cleaning provides a health benefit for years.
While studies have been performed to demonstrate
the effectiveness of cleaning procedures for
removing contaminants from within systems, no
scientific evidence exists to support the claims
by some cleaners that cleaning ducts improves
health. In fact, a recent ASHRAE study points out
the potential dangers to the indoor environment
that duct cleaning may pose to occupants.
Duct Cleaning: A Review of Associated Health
Effects and Results of Company and Expert Surveys
appeared earlier this year in ASHRAE
Transactions 2000. University of Minnesota
researcher Lisa M. Brosseau and her colleagues
assessed the hazards faced by cleaning personnel
and occupants in cases of non-routine duct
cleaning. Their findings are based on a thorough
literature review, and surveys of duct cleaning
firms and others in the IAQ field.
The ASHRAE study points out several areas where
occupant exposure to contaminants could arise
during and after duct cleaning. Both manual and
mechanical cleaning procedures offer the
possibility of introducing aerosolized dust and
fungal spores into the indoor breathing zone. The
use of anti-microbial agents and dust sealants is
cited as a possible source of chemical exposure.
The study points out that while these hazards are
readily identified by industry and engineering
controls may exist to negate them, "there is
much less agreement about how to clean the
systems." The implication is that some
cleaners may not take sufficient safeguards to
prevent occupants, or workers, from contamination
by allergens and materials found in HVAC systems.
Industry Response
IE Connections interviewed three
influential business owners in the HVAC system
cleaning field to get their reactions to the
recent onslaught of negative press about their
industry. Their responses shed important insights
into the subject and point out some facts that
the researchers haven't addressed.
"We have helped thousands of allergy and
asthma sufferers," says Tom Yacobellis,
President of DUCTBUSTERS, an HVAC system
cleaning franchise organization with more than 20
locations world-wide. "These people have
personally filled out testimonial forms and sent
them to our company locations throughout the
country. The messages are so positive that they
keep us motivated despite the tremendous amount
of negativity directed toward our industry from
outside. Not every client claims to feel better,
but the result of our work on behalf of allergy
and asthma sufferers often ranges from mild to
massive relief.
Yacobellis stresses that while his company's
customers with allergies usually note
improvements to their conditions after cleaning,
the type of cleaning performed by his franchisees
is superior to that performed by many independent
operators. "DUCTBUSTERS only provides a
total system cleaning, and that's after a full
system inspection and assessment. We don't just
clean ducts. Air handlers, coils and every other
part of the system is addressed, and we also
repair damaged internal insulation, Yacobellis
told IE Connections.
Many others in the HVAC system field tell
anecdotes of clients who experience dramatic
reductions in allergy or asthma symptoms after
duct cleaning. Huey Miller Jr. owns ServiceMaster
IAQ and also serves as president of the
Mechanical Systems Hygiene Institute (MSHI), a
division of the non-profit Association of
Specialists in Cleaning and Restoration (ASCR
International). He told IE Connections about an
influential public servant in his community whose
allergy symptoms virtually disappeared after
ServiceMaster IAQ cleaned, sanitized and coated
her HVAC system, repaired air leaks, and
installed pleated media filters in place of cheap
disposables. "She has become our best
salesperson, always telling how much she
appreciated what we did and how much better she
feels," said Miller.
The fact that emerging scientific evidence
appears to conflict with anecdotal evidence is
not lost to Bob Baker, CEO of BBJ Environmental
Solutions, a manufacturer of antimicrobials,
disinfectants and odor removal products.
"We should practice restraint and carefully
explain that much of our information comes
through long and repeated personal experiences
and not scientific research," cautions
Baker. He says that much of the criticism of the
duct cleaning industry is a result of confusing
observations and experiences - what he calls
"stories" - with objective data. At the
same time, he does not discount the importance of
anecdotal evidence. "Stories have their
place. Many of the advances of modern medicine
started as observations and stories that led to
solid research and new proofs," says Baker.
The indoor environment is a difficult setting to
study because so many factors contribute to air
quality. In that context, it is important for
researchers to qualify the information they put
forward. In the AAAI study, the researcher
measured dust mite allergens and cat allergens.
The study did not address fungi at all.
Nonetheless, after the Reuters press release the
story drew headlines like Air duct cleaning
unnecessary for preventing allergies. But
what about allergies to mold?
"Moisture and mold are the most common
problems associated with HVAC systems, yet the
AAAI study did not address them at all, said
Yacobellis. He worries that studying a small
segment of contaminants can lead to incomplete
conclusions. That sentiment was echoed by the
National Air Duct Cleaners Association (NADCA) in
response to the AAAI report.
In a position statement released at the Healthy
Indoor Environments conference in May, NADCA
argues that, "the conditions observed by
those [AAAAI] researchers were limited to a small
sample of homes in a single geographic
region," and that, "researchers may
have been guided by a limited definition of 'air
duct cleaning,'" that did not include
cleaning of fans, coils and other HVAC mechanical
components.
Like its members, NADCA falls back on the
perceptions of duct cleaning customers in defense
of its position that HVAC system cleaning may rid
the indoor environment of one potential allergy
and asthma trigger source. In response to the
question of whether air duct cleaning can
alleviate allergy symptoms, NADCA says for its
members the answer "can be found in the
comments of thousands of satisfied
customers."
|